Hadithcore
Sahih al-Bukhari, 2964
sahih

Narrated `Abdullah:

Today a man came to me and asked me a question which I did not know how to answer. He said, "Tell me, if a wealthy active man, well-equipped with arms, goes out on military expeditions with our chiefs, and orders us to do such things as we cannot do (should we obey him?)" I replied, "By Allah, I do not know what to reply you, except that we, were in the company of the Prophet (ﷺ) and he used to order us to do a thing once only till we finished it. And no doubt, everyone among you will remain in a good state as long as he obeys Allah. If one is in doubt as to the legality of something, he should ask somebody who would satisfy him, but soon will come a time when you will not find such a man. By Him, except Whom none has the right to be worshipped. I see that the example of what has passed of this life (to what remains thereof) is like a pond whose fresh water has been used up and nothing remains but muddy water."

حَدَّثَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنْ مَنْصُورٍ، عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ، قَالَ قَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ لَقَدْ أَتَانِي الْيَوْمَ رَجُلٌ فَسَأَلَنِي عَنْ أَمْرٍ مَا دَرَيْتُ مَا أَرُدُّ عَلَيْهِ، فَقَالَ أَرَأَيْتَ رَجُلاً مُؤْدِيًا نَشِيطًا، يَخْرُجُ مَعَ أُمَرَائِنَا فِي الْمَغَازِي، فَيَعْزِمُ عَلَيْنَا فِي أَشْيَاءَ لاَ نُحْصِيهَا‏.‏ فَقُلْتُ لَهُ وَاللَّهِ مَا أَدْرِي مَا أَقُولُ لَكَ إِلاَّ أَنَّا كُنَّا مَعَ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَعَسَى أَنْ لاَ يَعْزِمَ عَلَيْنَا فِي أَمْرٍ إِلاَّ مَرَّةً حَتَّى نَفْعَلَهُ، وَإِنَّ أَحَدَكُمْ لَنْ يَزَالَ بِخَيْرٍ مَا اتَّقَى اللَّهَ، وَإِذَا شَكَّ فِي نَفْسِهِ شَىْءٌ سَأَلَ رَجُلاً فَشَفَاهُ مِنْهُ، وَأَوْشَكَ أَنْ لاَ تَجِدُوهُ، وَالَّذِي لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ هُوَ مَا أَذْكُرُ مَا غَبَرَ مِنَ الدُّنْيَا إِلاَّ كَالثَّغْبِ شُرِبَ صَفْوُهُ وَبَقِيَ كَدَرُهُ‏.‏

References2 variants
In-Book Reference
Book 56, Hadith 174
USC-MSA web (English) reference
Vol. 4, Book 52, Hadith 209 (deprecated numbering scheme)
Sharh · explanationclick to expand
People’s obedience to the Imaam or ruler, or their deputies, is one of the most important means to rectify and put their religious and worldly affairs in orderand is required for fostering the unity of the Muslim community. The Islamic law clearly identified the defining lines that that determine the limits of people’s obedience to the Imaam and ruler. In this hadeeth, ‘Abdullaah ibn Mas‘ood(may Allah be pleased with him)narrated that someone asked him a question which he did not know how to answer. The man asked, "Tell me, if a wealthy active man, well-equipped with arms,” meaning that he is energetic and hastens to follow his pursuits and is well-equipped for war, “goes out on military expeditions with our chiefs,” meaning for Jihaad in Allah’s Cause, “and orders us to do such things as we cannot do,” meaning that this ruler or commander strictly imposed on them what they could not bear, “(should we obey him?)" Ibn Mas’ood(may Allah be pleased with him) replied, "By Allah, I do not know what to reply to you.” It was said that the reason Ibn Mas’ood(may Allah be pleased with him) refrained from issuing his Fatwaa (i.e., scholarly opinion) at first was because if an Imaam (i.e., ruler) appoints a group of fighters to partake in Jihaad or perform any given task, such responsibilities entrusted to them became individual obligations required of them.So, if any of these appointed people sought the Fatwaa of a scholar that such anImaamcan strictly impose obligations beyond people’s capabilities based on his personal whims, the Fatwaa would seem objectionable. Also, advising the complainer to obey the Imaam as enjoined may be objected to by the fact that rulers may grow corrupt during corrupt times. On the other hand, if the complainer is advised that it is permissible to rebel against such anImaam and defiantly disobey him, this Fatwaa could lead to Fitnah (i.e., dissension). Therefore, the right thing to do in such a situation was to refrain from issuing a Fatwaa. However, it seems that Ibn Mas‘ood(may Allah be pleased with him) retreated from this stance and then advised the man that he was obliged to obey his Imaam provided that his commands conformed with the enjoined mindfulness of Allah, Exalted is He, as inferred from Ibn Mas’ood’s statement. He (may Allah be pleased with him) added: “By Allah, I do not know what to reply to you except that we were in the company of the Prophetﷺ and he used to order us to do a thing once only till we finished it. No doubt everyone among you will remain in a good state as long as he obeys Allah, Exalted is He.” This indicated the Companions’ swift response (and obedience) to the Prophet’s commands. Whenever he ﷺ commanded them to do anything and emphasized it, they hastened to comply with his command without the need for repeating it. By doing so, Ibn Mas‘ood(may Allah be pleased with him) prudently issued his Fatwaa, advising this man that obedience to the Imaam was obligatory provided that his commands conformed with the enjoined mindfulness of Allah, Exalted is He. This entails that such an Imaam must not command them to avail themselves of any given legal concession in a situation where adherence to the original Islamic ruling is urged (as per the Islamic law) or the other way around. Allah, Exalted is He, Says (what means): {Allah does not charge a soul except [with that within] its capacity.} [Quran 2:286]. Afterward, Ibn Mas‘ood(may Allah be pleased with him) clarified that a Muslim is safe as long as he adheres to the enjoined mindfulness of Allah, Exalted is He. He (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “If one is in doubt as to the permissibility of something, he should ask somebody who would satisfy him,” meaning to give him a satisfying answer supported by evident truth to eliminate his doubts, and this urges a Muslim to refrain from doing anything about which he harbors doubts before asking those endowed with knowledge. Afterward, Ibn Mas‘ood(may Allah be pleased with him) bemoaned the fact that people would be deprived of knowledge by the death of their scholars as times and the Muslims’ situation would change by the passage of time and the distance from the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. At such times, people would not find someone to issue a Fatwaa in accordance with the truth, to relieve the hearts from doubts and misconceptions. Ibn Mas‘ood(may Allah be pleased with him) sadly added, “…but soon will come a time when you will not find such a man. By Him except Whom none has the right to be worshipped, I see that the example of what has passed of this life (to what remains thereof) is like a pond whose fresh water has been used up and nothing remains but muddywater.” In his statement, he (may Allah be pleased with him) likened the remaining period of the worldly life to a pond whose fresh water is used up and nothing remained but muddy water mixed with impurities and litter. It is deduced from the hadeeth that a scholar should not hasten to issue his Fatwaa regarding matters that seem objectionable to him. It is also inferred that the army commanders should not overburden the Muslim fighters, lest it should imperil some of them to disobedience. Rather, they should conveniently make things easier for them to the best of their abilities, consult with them, and keep them posted on latest updates that inform the way of handlingtheir affairs. It is also inferred from the hadeeth that whenever a person doubts something, he must not pass his judgment on it based on such doubts. Rather, he is required to inquire and investigate the matter further and seek the light of guidance from the people of knowledge, if any, otherwise he is required to act upon the fundamentals of the Islamic law, and apply Qiyaas (i.e., legal analogy) and Ijtihaad (i.e., personal reasoning)..