Reader edition
Sahih
Recorded by Sahih Muslim
Chain and evidence
A reader-first view of the preserved chains, narrator identities and the classical passages attached to them.
0 criticized · 1 unresolved
Edition labels and source wording are preserved as separate records. Multiple parser labels from one Arabic sentence are not counted as independent scholarly judgments.
Reader edition
Sahih
Recorded by Sahih Muslim
No separate grading sentence was extracted from the foundation text for this record. The reader-edition label above remains visible as its own source record.
These are descriptive summaries of the records shown on this page. They do not produce a new grade or authenticity ruling.
The reader edition records Sahih; no separate foundation grading sentence is attached.
Inspect grading records0/1 narrator identities are resolved. 0/0 direct links have comparator or accepted classical support; 0 links retain an unresolved endpoint.
Inspect the sanad0/4 related public chains share at least one resolved narrator; 0 direct transmission links repeat.
Inspect route overlap4 related Arabic wordings are aligned with this record. Additions and omissions are displayed as textual differences, without assigning an interpretive meaning.
Inspect wording variationNo scholarly proposition is attached yet. The workspace can record one without converting system signals into a conclusion.
Open scholarly annotationsNo formal classified disagreement is attached to this chain; this is not treated as proof of consensus.
Inspect scholarly positionsRecord a precise mas’ala and authored proposition, then attach the exact hadith, narrator, classical passage and accepted principle records used to support, contextualise or challenge it.
These are authored research propositions, not system-generated rulings. Every entry keeps its author, review state and exact evidence links. Acceptance requires a different named reviewer.
Open the cross-hadith istidlal index →·Manage scholar identities →No scholarly annotation has been authored for this hadith yet. The evidence remains available above and below without an inferred conclusion.
The Arabic sanad is preserved as transmitted. Identified narrator names below it are clickable.
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ يَحْيَى، وَقُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، وَأَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ قَالَ يَحْيَى أَخْبَرَنَا وَقَالَ الآخَرَانِ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الأَحْوَصِ، عَنْ سِمَاكٍ، عَنْ مُوسَى بْنِ طَلْحَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
Path 1: 0/1 identities resolved; 0 narrator dossiers contain source evidence.
Criticism and uncertainty are shown distinctly. The system does not collapse different critics into a manufactured verdict.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
Attributed statements remain attached to their scholars and sources. A disagreement is reported only when accepted classified claims actually differ.
No formal conflict appears among the accepted classified claims attached to narrators in this chain. This is not a declaration of consensus: individual attributed statements and unreviewed material remain visible in the narrator evidence below.
Open a narrator to inspect linked biographical passages, attributed assessments, structured facts and relationship evidence.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
This compares the public chains of related narrations. Shared identities and links are route overlap, not an automatic authenticity ruling.
No complete narrator-to-narrator link repeats across the currently related public chains. Narrator-level overlap is still shown route by route below.
0 shared narrators
No shared resolved narrator identity is recorded in the public chains.
0 shared narrators
No shared resolved narrator identity is recorded in the public chains.
0 shared narrators
No shared resolved narrator identity is recorded in the public chains.
0 shared narrators
No shared resolved narrator identity is recorded in the public chains.
Related Arabic wordings are aligned to this hadith in their recorded order. Highlighting identifies textual additions or omissions only; it does not assign legal, theological or authenticity significance.
Matching ignores vocalisation, punctuation and light alif/ya spelling differences, while the displayed wording preserves the original recorded word forms. Reordered words can appear as an addition and an omission.
Related wording
إِذَا وَضَعَ أَحَدُكُمْ بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِثْلَ مُؤَخَّرَةِ الرَّحْلِ فَلْيُصَلِّ وَلاَ يُبَالِي مَنْ مَرَّ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ
Related wording
وَعَنْ طَلْحَةَ بْنِ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسلم: «إِذا وَضَعَ أَحَدُكُمْ بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِثْلَ مُؤْخِرَةِ الرَّحْلِ فَليصل وَلَا يبال من مر وَرَاء ذَلِك» رَوَاهُ مُسلم
No aligned omissions.
Related wording
مِثْلُ مُؤْخِرَةِ الرَّحْلِ
No aligned additions.
Related wording
مِثْلُ مُؤْخِرَةِ الرَّحْلِ
No aligned additions.
Read nearby narrations normally, or open the advanced comparison to see shared chain links.
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was asked about sutra of a worshipper; he said: Equal to the back of the saddle.
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: "When one of you placed something like the post (handle) of the camel saddle in front of him, then let him perform Salat and not concern himself with who passes beyond that."
"The messenger of Allah(ﷺ) was asked during the campaign of Tabuk about the Sutra of one who is praying. He said: "Something as high as the back of a camel saddle."
Talha b. ‘Ubaidallah reported God’s Messenger as saying, “When one of you places in front of him something such as the back of a saddle, he should pray without caring who passes on the other side of it.” Muslim transmitted it.