Reader edition
Sahih
Recorded by Sahih al-Bukhari
Chain and evidence
A reader-first view of the preserved chains, narrator identities and the classical passages attached to them.
0 criticized · 3 unresolved
Edition labels and source wording are preserved as separate records. Multiple parser labels from one Arabic sentence are not counted as independent scholarly judgments.
Reader edition
Sahih
Recorded by Sahih al-Bukhari
No separate grading sentence was extracted from the foundation text for this record. The reader-edition label above remains visible as its own source record.
These are descriptive summaries of the records shown on this page. They do not produce a new grade or authenticity ruling.
The reader edition records Sahih; no separate foundation grading sentence is attached.
Inspect grading records0/3 narrator identities are resolved. 0/2 direct links have comparator or accepted classical support; 2 links retain an unresolved endpoint.
Inspect the sanad2/3 related public chains share at least one resolved narrator; 3 direct transmission links repeat.
Inspect route overlap3 related Arabic wordings are aligned with this record. Additions and omissions are displayed as textual differences, without assigning an interpretive meaning.
Inspect wording variationNo scholarly proposition is attached yet. The workspace can record one without converting system signals into a conclusion.
Open scholarly annotationsNo formal classified disagreement is attached to this chain; this is not treated as proof of consensus.
Inspect scholarly positionsRecord a precise mas’ala and authored proposition, then attach the exact hadith, narrator, classical passage and accepted principle records used to support, contextualise or challenge it.
These are authored research propositions, not system-generated rulings. Every entry keeps its author, review state and exact evidence links. Acceptance requires a different named reviewer.
Open the cross-hadith istidlal index →·Manage scholar identities →No scholarly annotation has been authored for this hadith yet. The evidence remains available above and below without an inferred conclusion.
The Arabic sanad is preserved as transmitted. Identified narrator names below it are clickable.
0/2 links corroborated
حَدَّثَنَا مُقَدَّمُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ يَحْيَى ، حَدَّثَنَا عَمِّي الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ يَحْيَى ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ ، وَقَدْ سَمِعَ مِنْهُ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ أَنَّ رَجُلاً، رَمَى امْرَأَتَهُ فَانْتَفَى مِنْ وَلَدِهَا فِي زَمَانِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
Path 1: 0/3 identities resolved; 0 narrator dossiers contain source evidence; 0/2 edges corroborated; 2 unresolved edge endpoints; 0 generation-order conflicts.
Criticism and uncertainty are shown distinctly. The system does not collapse different critics into a manufactured verdict.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
Attributed statements remain attached to their scholars and sources. A disagreement is reported only when accepted classified claims actually differ.
No formal conflict appears among the accepted classified claims attached to narrators in this chain. This is not a declaration of consensus: individual attributed statements and unreviewed material remain visible in the narrator evidence below.
Open a narrator to inspect linked biographical passages, attributed assessments, structured facts and relationship evidence.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
This compares the public chains of related narrations. Shared identities and links are route overlap, not an automatic authenticity ruling.
2 shared narrators
2 shared narrators
0 shared narrators
No shared resolved narrator identity is recorded in the public chains.
Related Arabic wordings are aligned to this hadith in their recorded order. Highlighting identifies textual additions or omissions only; it does not assign legal, theological or authenticity significance.
Matching ignores vocalisation, punctuation and light alif/ya spelling differences, while the displayed wording preserves the original recorded word forms. Reordered words can appear as an addition and an omission.
Related wording
حَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى بْنُ قَزَعَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ رضى الله عنهما أَنَّ رَجُلاً، لاَعَنَ امْرَأَتَهُ فِي زَمَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَانْتَفَى مِنْ وَلَدِهَا فَفَرَّقَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَيْنَهُمَا، وَأَلْحَقَ الْوَلَدَ بِالْمَرْأَةِ.
Related wording
وَحَدَّثَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، لاَعَنَ امْرَأَتَهُ فِي زَمَانِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَانْتَفَلَ مِنْ وَلَدِهَا فَفَرَّقَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَيْنَهُمَا وَأَلْحَقَ الْوَلَدَ بِالْمَرْأَةِ
Related wording
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ بُكَيْرٍ، حَدَّثَنَا مَالِكٌ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي نَافِعٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم لاَعَنَ بَيْنَ رَجُلٍ وَامْرَأَتِهِ، فَانْتَفَى مِنْ وَلَدِهَا فَفَرَّقَ بَيْنَهُمَا، وَأَلْحَقَ الْوَلَدَ بِالْمَرْأَةِ.
Read nearby narrations normally, or open the advanced comparison to see shared chain links.
The Prophet (ﷺ) made a man and his wife carry out Lian, and the husband repudiated her child. So the Prophet (ﷺ) got them separated (by divorce) and decided that the child belonged to the mother only.
A man and his wife had a case of Lian (or Mula'ana) during the lifetime of the Prophet (ﷺ) and the man denied the paternity of her child. The Prophet (ﷺ) gave his verdict for their separation (divorce) and then the child was regarded as belonging to the wife only.
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafic from Abdullah ibn Umar that a man cursed his wife in the time of the Messenger of Allah, (ﷺ), and disowned her child. The Messenger of Allah, (ﷺ), separated them and gave the child to the woman. Malik said, "Allah the Blessed, the Exalted, said, 'The testimony of men who accuse their wives but do not have any witnesses except themselves is to testify by Allah four times that he is being truthful, and a fifth time, that the curse of Allah will be upon him, if he should be a liar. She will avoid punishment if she testifies by Allah four times that he is a liar, and a fifth time, that the wrath of Allah shall be upon her, if he should be telling the truth. ' "(Sura 24 ayat 6). Malik said, "The sunna with us is that those who curse each other are never to be remarried. If the man calls himself a liar, (i.e. takes back his accusation), he is flogged with the hadd-punishment, and the child is given to him, and his wife can never return to him. There is no doubt or dispute about this sunna among us. " Malik said, "If a man separates from his wife by an irrevocable divorce by which he cannot return to her, and then he denies the paternity of the child she is carrying, whilst she claims that he is the father, and it is possible by the timing, that he be so, he must curse her, and the child is not recognised as his." Malik said, "That is what is done among us, and it is what I have heard from the people of knowledge." Malik said that a man who accused his wife after he had divorced her trebly while she was pregnant, and he had at first accepted being the father but then claimed that he had seen her committing adultery before he separated from her, was flogged with the hadd-punishment, and did not curse her. If he denied the paternity of her child after he had divorced her trebly, and he had not previously accepted it, then he cursed her. Malik said, "This is what I have heard." Malik said, "The slave is in the same position as the free man as regards making accusations and invoking mutual curses (lian). He acts in the lian as the free man acts although there is no hadd applied for slandering a female-slave." Malik said, "The muslim slave-girl and the christian and jewish free woman also do lian when a free muslim marries one of them and has intercourse with her. That is because Allah - may He be blessed and Exalted, said in His Book, 'As for those who accuse their wives,' and they are their wives. This is what is done among us. Malik said that a man who did the lian with his wife, and then stopped and called himself a liar after one or two oaths and he had not cursed himself in the fifth one, had to be flogged with the hadd-punishment, but they did not have to be separated. Malik said that if a man divorced his wife and then after three months the woman said, "I am pregnant," and he denied paternity, then he had to do lian. Malik said that the husband of a female slave who pronounced the lian on her and then bought her, was not to have intercourse with her, even if he owned her. The sunna which had been handed down about a couple who mutually cursed each other in the lian was that they were never to return to each other. Malik said that when a man pronounced the lian against his wife before he had consummated the marriage, she only had half of the bride price.