Reader edition
Sahih
Recorded by Sahih al-Bukhari
Chain and evidence
A reader-first view of the preserved chains, narrator identities and the classical passages attached to them.
0 criticized · 6 unresolved
Edition labels and source wording are preserved as separate records. Multiple parser labels from one Arabic sentence are not counted as independent scholarly judgments.
Reader edition
Sahih
Recorded by Sahih al-Bukhari
No separate grading sentence was extracted from the foundation text for this record. The reader-edition label above remains visible as its own source record.
These are descriptive summaries of the records shown on this page. They do not produce a new grade or authenticity ruling.
The reader edition records Sahih; no separate foundation grading sentence is attached.
Inspect grading records0/6 narrator identities are resolved. 0/5 direct links have comparator or accepted classical support; 5 links retain an unresolved endpoint.
Inspect the sanad3/3 related public chains share at least one resolved narrator; 3 direct transmission links repeat.
Inspect route overlap3 related Arabic wordings are aligned with this record. Additions and omissions are displayed as textual differences, without assigning an interpretive meaning.
Inspect wording variationNo scholarly proposition is attached yet. The workspace can record one without converting system signals into a conclusion.
Open scholarly annotationsNo formal classified disagreement is attached to this chain; this is not treated as proof of consensus.
Inspect scholarly positionsRecord a precise mas’ala and authored proposition, then attach the exact hadith, narrator, classical passage and accepted principle records used to support, contextualise or challenge it.
These are authored research propositions, not system-generated rulings. Every entry keeps its author, review state and exact evidence links. Acceptance requires a different named reviewer.
Open the cross-hadith istidlal index →·Manage scholar identities →No scholarly annotation has been authored for this hadith yet. The evidence remains available above and below without an inferred conclusion.
The Arabic sanad is preserved as transmitted. Identified narrator names below it are clickable.
0/5 links corroborated
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْيَمَانِ ، أَخْبَرَنَا شُعَيْبٌ ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الزِّنَادِ ، عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ أَمَرَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
Highlighted in this colour: Accepted as the owner's exception: this identification rule is right 99.39% of the time on gold it never saw, one error short of the project's bar. Kunya names two men share are where it has been wrong. Invited reviewers can verify it. See and verify
Path 1: 0/6 identities resolved; 0 narrator dossiers contain source evidence; 0/5 edges corroborated; 5 unresolved edge endpoints; 0 generation-order conflicts.
Criticism and uncertainty are shown distinctly. The system does not collapse different critics into a manufactured verdict.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
No authority status loaded
No source-attributed critical statement is attached to this identity yet.
Attributed statements remain attached to their scholars and sources. A disagreement is reported only when accepted classified claims actually differ.
No formal conflict appears among the accepted classified claims attached to narrators in this chain. This is not a declaration of consensus: individual attributed statements and unreviewed material remain visible in the narrator evidence below.
Open a narrator to inspect linked biographical passages, attributed assessments, structured facts and relationship evidence.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
The chain identity is present, but no linked classical passage is loaded for it yet.
This compares the public chains of related narrations. Shared identities and links are route overlap, not an automatic authenticity ruling.
3 shared narrators
3 shared narrators
3 shared narrators
Related Arabic wordings are aligned to this hadith in their recorded order. Highlighting identifies textual additions or omissions only; it does not assign legal, theological or authenticity significance.
Matching ignores vocalisation, punctuation and light alif/ya spelling differences, while the displayed wording preserves the original recorded word forms. Reordered words can appear as an addition and an omission.
Related wording
مَا يَنْقِمُ ابْنُ جَمِيلٍ إِلاَّ أَنَّهُ كَانَ فَقِيرًا فَأَغْنَاهُ اللَّهُ وَأَمَّا خَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ فَإِنَّكُمْ تَظْلِمُونَ خَالِدًا قَدِ احْتَبَسَ أَدْرَاعَهُ وَأَعْتُدَهُ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَأَمَّا الْعَبَّاسُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْمُطَّلِبِ عَمُّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَهِيَ عَلَيْهِ صَدَقَةٌ وَمِثْلُهَا مَعَهَا
Related wording
حَدَّثَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ الصَّبَّاحِ، حَدَّثَنَا شَبَابَةُ، عَنْ وَرْقَاءَ، عَنْ أَبِي الزِّنَادِ، عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ بَعَثَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ عَلَى الصَّدَقَةِ فَمَنَعَ ابْنُ جَمِيلٍ وَخَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ وَالْعَبَّاسُ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم مَا يَنْقِمُ ابْنُ جَمِيلٍ إِلاَّ أَنْ كَانَ فَقِيرًا فَأَغْنَاهُ اللَّهُ وَأَمَّا خَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ فَإِنَّكُمْ تَظْلِمُونَ خَالِدًا فَقَدِ احْتَبَسَ أَدْرَاعَهُ وَأَعْتُدَهُ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَأَمَّا الْعَبَّاسُ عَمُّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَهِيَ عَلَىَّ وَمِثْلُهَا ثُمَّ قَالَ أَمَا شَعَرْتَ أَنَّ عَمَّ الرَّجُلِ صِنْوُ الأَبِ أَوْ صِنْوُ أَبِيهِ
Related wording
وَحَدَّثَنِي زُهَيْرُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حَفْصٍ، حَدَّثَنَا وَرْقَاءُ، عَنْ أَبِي الزِّنَادِ، عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ بَعَثَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم عُمَرَ عَلَى الصَّدَقَةِ فَقِيلَ مَنَعَ ابْنُ جَمِيلٍ وَخَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ وَالْعَبَّاسُ عَمُّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم مَا يَنْقِمُ ابْنُ جَمِيلٍ إِلاَّ أَنَّهُ كَانَ فَقِيرًا فَأَغْنَاهُ اللَّهُ وَأَمَّا خَالِدٌ فَإِنَّكُمْ تَظْلِمُونَ خَالِدًا قَدِ احْتَبَسَ أَدْرَاعَهُ وَأَعْتَادَهُ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَأَمَّا الْعَبَّاسُ فَهِيَ عَلَىَّ وَمِثْلُهَا مَعَهَا ثُمَّ قَالَ يَا عُمَرُ أَمَا شَعَرْتَ أَنَّ عَمَّ الرَّجُلِ صِنْوُ أَبِيهِ
Read nearby narrations normally, or open the advanced comparison to see shared chain links.
Ibn Jamil is taking revenge but for this that he was destitute and Allah made him rich. As regards Khalid, you are unjust to Khalid, for be reserved his armours and weapons for the sake of Allah, and as for 'Abbas, I shall be responsible for it and an equal amount along with it. And he again said: 'Umar, bear this in mind, the uncle of a person is like his father.
The Prophet(ﷺ) sent Umar b. al-Khattab to collect sadaqa (All the people paid the zakat but ibn-jamil, Khalid b. al-walid and al-abbas refused. So the Messenger of Allah(ﷺ) said : Ibn-jamil is not (so much) objecting, but he was poor and Allah enriched him. As for Khalid b. Walid, you are wronging him, for he has kept back his courts of mail and weapons to use them in Allah’s path. As for al-Abbas, the uncle of the Messenger of Allah(ﷺ), I shall be responsible for it and an equal amount along with it. Then he said did you not know(Umar) that a man’s paternal uncle is of the same stock as the father or his father?
"Umar said: 'The Messenger of Allah enjoined Sadaqah and it was said that Ibn Jamil, Khalid bin Al-Walid and 'Abbas bin 'Abdul-Muttalib had withheld some. The Messenger of Allah said: What is the matter with Ibn Jamil? Was he not poor then Allah made him rich? As for Khalid bin Al-Walid, you are being unfair to Khalid, for he is saving his shields and weapons for the sake of Allah. As for Al-Abbas bin 'Abdul-Muttalib, the paternal uncle of the Messenger of Allah, it is and obligatory charity for him and he has to pay as much again."'